S. TUNCER Et Al. , "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results," Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4, pp.253-263, 2017
TUNCER, S. Et Al. 2017. Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4 , 253-263.
TUNCER, S., DEMİRCİ, M., ÖZTAŞ, S. E., TEKÇE, N., & UYSAL, Ö., (2017). Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4, 253-263.
TUNCER, SAFA Et Al. "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results," Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4, 253-263, 2017
TUNCER, SAFA Et Al. "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results." Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4, pp.253-263, 2017
TUNCER, S. Et Al. (2017) . "Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results." Restorative Dentistry Endodontics , vol.42, no.4, pp.253-263.
@article{article, author={SAFA TUNCER Et Al. }, title={Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results}, journal={Restorative Dentistry Endodontics}, year=2017, pages={253-263} }