A criticism of applications with multi-criteria decision analysis that are used for the site selection for the disposal of municipal solid wastes


Korucu M. K., ERDAĞI B.

WASTE MANAGEMENT, cilt.32, sa.12, ss.2315-2323, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 32 Sayı: 12
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.003
  • Dergi Adı: WASTE MANAGEMENT
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2315-2323
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Municipal solid waste, Final disposal, Site selection, Multi-criteria decision analysis, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS, ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS, LANDFILL SITE, CHOICE EXPERIMENT, SOCIAL COSTS, MANAGEMENT, GIS, METHODOLOGY, AHP, PLANT
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The main aim of this study is to criticize the process of selecting the most appropriate site for the disposal of municipal solid wastes which is one of the problematic issues of waste management operations. These kinds of problems are pathological symptoms of existing problematical human-nature relationship which is related to the syndrome called ecological crisis. In this regard, solving the site selection problem, which is just a small part of a larger entity, for the good of ecological rationality and social justice is only possible by founding a new and extensive type of human-nature relationship. In this study, as a problematic point regarding the discussions on ecological problems, the existing structure of the applications using multi-criteria decision analysis in the process of site selection with three main criteria is criticized. Based on this critique, fundamental problematic points (to which applications are insufficient to find solutions) will be defined. Later, some modifications will be suggested in order to provide solutions to these problematical points. Finally, the criticism addressed to the structure of the method with three main criteria and the feasibility of the new method with four main criteria is subjected to an evaluation process. As a result, it is emphasized that the new structure with four main criteria may be effective in solution of the fundamental problematic points. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.