SIGNA VITAE, vol.21, no.5, pp.49-54, 2025 (Scopus)
Abstract
Background: One of the most encountered challenges in trauma is predicting an
intraabdominal hollow viscus injury or foreseeing a nontherapeutic laparotomy in
patients with penetrating abdominal stab injuries. Suspicious computed tomography
(CT) findings like free air and free fluid can leave surgeons in doubt about an
injury’s presence. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic and nontherapeutic
laparotomy results in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds who had
suspicious intraabdominal hollow viscus injury CT findings. Methods: Retrospective
and single-center cohort of all patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds between
January 2012 and January 2023 in Gebze Fatih State Hospital were evaluated. All
patients had CT evaluation and complete blood count (CBC) and then underwent
laparotomy. The laparotomies were classified as therapeutic or nontherapeutic and the
patients were grouped according to the results.We then analyzed the diagnostic value
of CT and initial CBC on laparotomy. Results: A total of 91 patients with penetrating
abdominal stab wound who underwent laparotomy were included in the study. Of the 91
patients, 56 (61.5%) had nontherapeutic laparotomies, and 35 (38.4%) had therapeutic
laparotomies for hollow viscus injury. The CT findings of intraabdominal free air or fluid
were present in all patients but were not significant predictors of hollow viscus injury
(p value, 0.06, 0.09, respectively). The initial CBC values, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio
and platelets/lymphocyte ratio were also not significant predictors (p-value, 0.49, 0.37,
respectively). Conclusions: In this retrospective study of abdominal penetrating stab
wound management, we were not able to use the CT and CBC to distinguish the injuries
that require therapeutic laparotomy for hollow viscus injury.
Keywords
Penetrating; Stab; Trauma; Computed tomography; Nontherapeutic laparotomy