Evaluation of prostheses retained zygomatic and dental implants in large defects in the maxilla due to tumors or major trauma by biomechanical 3- dimensional finite element analysis


YEMENOĞLU H., BEDER M., YAYLACI M., Dizdar A., ALKURT M., NARALAN M. E., ...More

BMC oral health, vol.25, no.1, pp.99, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 25 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.1186/s12903-025-05468-7
  • Journal Name: BMC oral health
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Page Numbers: pp.99
  • Keywords: Dental implant, Finite element analysis, Zygomatic implant
  • Kocaeli University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Zygomatic implants are becoming an ideal treatment approach for implant-supported prosthesis treatment developed for the atrophic maxilla. This study aims to evaluate the amount and distribution of stress in implants and peri-implant bone using different implant-supported prosthesis configurations in Aramany Class I maxillary defects through 3-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite element model of the Aramany class I defect was created. Three different implant-supported prostheses were modelled: model 1: 1 zygomatic implant and 3 dental implants, model 2: 1 zygomatic implant and 2 dental implants, and model 3: 2 zygomatic implants. Vertical and horizontal loads of 150 N were applied in 6 different ways to the defected and non-defective areas. Maximum principal stress and von mises stresses in the bone surrounding the implants were evaluated. RESULTS: When all loading conditions were evaluated with both porcelain layer on Co-Cr framework and acrylic layer on acrylic framework, the highest maximum principal stress value was observed in Model 3. In contrast, the lowest value was observed in Model 1. The highest maximum principal stress occurred when a horizontal load was applied simultaneously to both the defective and non-defective areas. In contrast, the lowest value was observed when a vertical load was applied to the non-defective area. The von Mises stress values were found to be similar across all models when both restoration materials were used. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that increasing the number of implants in the non-defective area reduces the highest stress value while using acrylic as a restoration material slightly increases the stress value.