Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients The ENDORSE Global Survey


Creative Commons License

Bergmann J., Cohen A. T., Tapson V. F., Goldhaber S. Z., Kakkar A. K., Deslandes B., ...Daha Fazla

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, cilt.103, sa.4, ss.736-748, 2010 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 103 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2010
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1160/th09-09-0667
  • Dergi Adı: THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.736-748
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: ACCP guideline use, ENDORSE, hospitalised medical patients, prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism, FATAL PULMONARY-EMBOLISM, GUIDELINES, THROMBOSIS, PREVENTION, FAILURE, CANCER
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Limited data are available regarding the risk for venous thromboembolism (VIE) and VIE prophylaxis use in hospitalised medically ill patients. We analysed data from the global ENDORSE survey to evaluate VTE risk and prophylaxis use in this population according to diagnosis, baseline characteristics, and country. Data on patient characteristics, VIE risk, and prophylaxis use were abstracted from hospital charts. VTE risk and prophylaxis use were evaluated according to the 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Data were evaluated for 37,356 hospitalised medical patients across 32 countries. VIE risk varied according to medical diagnosis, from 31.2% of patients with gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary diseases to 100% of patients with acute heart failure, active noninfectious respiratory disease, or pulmonary infection (global rate, 41.5%). Among those at risk for VTE, ACCP-recommended prophylaxis was used in 24.4% haemorrhagic stroke patients and 40-45% of cardiopulmonary disease patients (global rate, 39.5%). Large differences in prophylaxis use were observed among countries. Markers of disease severity, including central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, and admission to intensive care units, were strongly associated with use of ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. In conclusion, VIE risk varies according to medical diagnosis. Less than 40% of at-risk hospitalised medical patients receive ACCP-recommended prophylaxis. Prophylaxis use appears to be associated with disease severity rather than medical diagnosis. These data support the necessity to improve implementation of available guidelines for evaluating VIE risk and providing prophylaxis to hospitalised medical patients.