Neoliberal governance towards the non-German-speaking world in Austria's internationalization of higher education


Nao M., Yuksel D., Zuaro B., Wingrove P., Hultgren A. K.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE, cilt.2025, sa.295, ss.53-77, 2025 (ESCI, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 2025 Sayı: 295
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1515/ijsl-2024-0122
  • Dergi Adı: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LANGUAGE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, FRANCIS, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Periodicals Index Online, Communication & Mass Media Index, Communication Abstracts, Index Islamicus, Linguistic Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Political Science Complete, Social services abstracts, Sociological abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, DIALNET
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.53-77
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

As in many parts of Europe, Austria has seen increasing internationalization of its public universities since modernization reforms towards autonomy and accompanying steering-at-a-distance practices of state ministries. Here, we explore the sociolinguistic relevance of such neoliberal governance on this trend. In a novel turn, we invert the common lens on English as an incoming language to examine instead the monitoring of internationalization data from the pluricentric context of the German-speaking DACH region, comprising Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. We expound on this as an imagined speech community, vis-& agrave;-vis which Austria can be seen through steering at multiscalar level to rearticulate its very identity as a nation state. As part of an innovative use of process tracing methodology, we consulted policy documentation and monitoring data on DACH internationalization in order to probe key stakeholders at a public case study university and at ministerial level on its relevance. An analysis of stance revealed that steering conversations mutually reinforced a move away from the inbound mobility of students and staff from DACH - a dynamic that was disfavoured as inhibitory of progress, a less real form of internationalization, and unambitious, thereby at odds with neoliberal governance towards performance and competitiveness.