Photovoltaic module temperature prediction using various machine learning algorithms: Performance evaluation


Keddouda A., Ihaddadene R., Boukhari A., Atia A., ARICI M., Lebbihiat N., ...Daha Fazla

Applied Energy, cilt.363, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 363
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123064
  • Dergi Adı: Applied Energy
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Environment Index, INSPEC, Pollution Abstracts, Public Affairs Index, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Ambient conditions, Machine learning, Prediction, PV module temperature, PV power
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This paper presents data-driven models for photovoltaic module temperature prediction and analyzes the relation and effects of ambient conditions to module temperature. A total of 12 different machine learning and regression algorithms are implemented, with a large experimental dataset of 345,600 × 7. Prior to implementing those algorithms, data preprocessing is performed to prepare the datasets and determine the informative attributes for the models. Using PCA with module temperature as target to predict, the selected features for models' inputs were determined to be ambient temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, and relative humidity, and each algorithm is cross-validated and tuned with optimal performance parameters. Results show that while relative humidity is more likely to introduce less information to the model, other aforementioned features are the important parameters to predict the module temperature. While for linear modeling, LASSO algorithm provided the best performance, the ANN model demonstrated the best overall results as it produced the most accurate predictions with lowest errors. A similar performance is attained by the proposed non-linear model, KRR and Gradient Boosting algorithm, with a slight advantage to the KRR model. Furthermore, in comparison to experimental data, the ANN model and the proposed non-linear model provided an R2 values of 0.986 and 0.981, with a MAE of 0.982 and 1.476, and MSE of 2.181and 3.464, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model supplied accurate results when compared to models from literature in an out-of-sample testing, it also proven to be robust and accurate when used to predict the PV power output.