PANCREATIC PATHOLOGY AND ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY


Creative Commons License

Yaprak Bayrak B.

NAURYZ 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, Ankara, Türkiye, 10 - 12 Nisan 2022, cilt.1, ss.34-39

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Tam Metin Bildiri
  • Cilt numarası: 1
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Ankara
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.34-39
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is becoming the standard tool for

obtaining cell block from pancreatic mass, which may also contribute to immunohistochemical study.

However, in some cases, a single cytological or histological evaluation may not be sufficient for

diagnosis. In this study, I aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic

masses.

Patients who underwent EUS-FNA-guided procedure for pancreatic mass between June 2021 and

January 2022 were included in the study retrospectively. Diff-Quick and Papanicolaou staining were

applied to the obtained smears. Cell blocks were tried to be obtained and immunohistochemical stainings

were stained for the diagnosis of these blocks and all were analyzed.

There were 27 patients (14 women and 13 men; age ranges 27-92) who had a pancreatic mass and

underwent EUS-FNA. When the aspiration and cell blocks obtained from four of the 27 patients were

examined, they were considered non-diagnostic and could not be diagnosed with malignancy, since they

contained hemorrhagic and fibrinous material. 21 patients were diagnosed with malignancy. While 3 of

them were neuroendocrine tumors, 18 of them were adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemical staining

was performed on the cell blocks of 3 cases for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. 2 patients were

diagnosed as benign. One was diagnosed with pancreatitis and the other with pseudocyst.

In fine-needle aspirations for pancreatic masses, correct needle selection and material acquisition with

the correct technique (and subsequently on-site cytological evaluation) cause an increase in aspiration

adequacy rates. And thus, the rate of correct diagnosis to the patient increases considerably. The

experience of the pathologist and gastroenterologist is also very important in these cases.