Oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer in good prognosis patients.

Ozer, Gonul; Yuksel, Beril; Yucel Cicek, ÖZGE; Kahraman, Semra

doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102030

Oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer in good prognosis patients.

Copy For Citation

Ozer G., Yuksel B., Yucel Cicek Ö. S., Kahraman S.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, vol.50, pp.102030, 2020 (SCI-Expanded)

Publication Type: Article / Article
Volume: 50
Publication Date: 2020
Doi Number: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102030
Journal Name: Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
Page Numbers: pp.102030
Keywords: Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle, In vitro fertilization, Luteal phase support, Oral dydrogesterone, Randomized controlled trial, EMBRYO-TRANSFER CYCLES, NATURAL CYCLE, METAANALYSIS, PROTOCOLS, FRESH, IVF
Kocaeli University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support (LPS) in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET) compared to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) gel.