Recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors undergoing surgery: Phase 3, single-arm, open-label study


Pfrepper C., Radossi P., Windyga J., Kavakli K., Schutgens R., SARPER N., ...Daha Fazla

HAEMOPHILIA, cilt.30, sa.2, ss.395-403, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 30 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/hae.14932
  • Dergi Adı: HAEMOPHILIA
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.395-403
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: factor VIII, haemophilia A, haemostasis, neutralizing antibodies, perioperative period
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is predicted to provide functional FVIII activity in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAWI). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rpFVIII in patients with CHAWI undergoing invasive procedures. Methods: This phase 3, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study (NCT02895945) enrolled males aged 12-75 years with severe/moderately severe CHAWI who required surgical/invasive procedures. Patients received a loading dose of rpFVIII 1-2 h before surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of all procedures with a 'good' or 'excellent' response (treatment success) on the global haemostatic efficacy assessment score. Results: Of the eight dosed patients, five completed the study. Six of seven surgeries (85.7%; 95% confidence interval, 42.1-99.6) achieved treatment success; five were rated 'excellent', one was rated 'good'. Seven surgery-related bleeding episodes occurred in three patients during the study, with none requiring additional surgical intervention. Overall, six of eight patients experienced 17 treatment-emergent adverse events. Three patients developed de novo inhibitors to rpFVIII. Five patients reported anamnestic reactions, three to both human (h) FVIII (i.e., alloantibodies to exogenous FVIII detected with anti-hFVIII assays) and rpFVIII, and two to hFVIII only. Four serious adverse events were considered related to rpFVIII (three anti-rpFVIII antibody positive; one anamnestic reaction to hFVIII and rpFVIII). Conclusion: Good haemostasis was achieved with rpFVIII during the immediate perioperative period. The study was terminated early because the study sponsor and health authorities determined that the risk of anamnestic reactions outweighs the benefits in this study population.