Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bone Metastasis Management: A Narrative Review


Creative Commons License

Bulut H., DEMİRÖZ S., Kanay E., Ozkan K., Errani C.

Current Oncology, cilt.33, sa.1, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/curroncol33010065
  • Dergi Adı: Current Oncology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: artificial intelligence, bone metastasis, machine learning, orthopedic oncology, prognostic modeling
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used in the diagnosis and management of bone metastases, spanning lesion detection, segmentation, prognostic modeling, fracture risk assessment, and surgical decision support. However, the literature is heterogeneous and rapidly evolving, making it difficult for clinicians to contextualize these developments. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature on AI/ML applications in bone metastasis management, focusing on studies that address clinically relevant problems such as detection and segmentation of metastatic lesions, prediction of skeletal-related events and survival, and support for reconstructive decision-making. We prioritized recent, peer-reviewed work that reports model performance and highlights opportunities for clinical translation. Results: Most published studies center on imaging-based diagnosis and lesion segmentation using radiomics and deep learning, with generally high internal performance but limited external validation. Emerging work explores prognostic models and biomechanically informed fracture risk estimation, yet these remain at an early proof-of-concept stage. Very few frameworks are integrated into routine workflows, and explainability, bias mitigation, and health-economic impacts are rarely evaluated. Conclusions: AI and ML tools have substantial potential to standardize imaging assessment, refine risk stratification, and ultimately support personalized management of bone metastases. Future research should focus on externally validated, multimodal models; development of AI-augmented alternatives to the Mirels score; federated multicenter collaboration; and routine incorporation of explainability and cost-effectiveness analyses.